Experts say the U.S. Supreme Court ruling ushered in an era of unprecedented spending on elections by ultra-wealthy special ...

In January 2010, the Supreme Court significantly weakened existing campaign finance laws. The Court's ruling in Citizen's United v. FEC — the latest and most sweeping of a long string of court ...

The 2024 federal election cycle was the most secretive since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010. Dark money ...

Supreme Court observers have been waiting a long time for the decision in Citizens United v. FEC, the “Hillary: The Movie case” that was first argued last March, reargued in September ...

FEC . Clinton said that the Citizens United ruling should be reversed “once and for all, even if it takes a constitutional amendment,” according to MSNBC’s Ari Melber. In Citizens United ...

Northwestern’s Pritzker School of Law hosted a debate to discuss whether the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission undermined democracy Wednesday. The event was a ...

that was the rationale given by the Supreme Court in its 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, ...

It further upheld the constitutionality of requiring public expenditure disclosure statements to be routinely filed with the Federal Election Commission. Coupled with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

How do you compete with that? Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is the controversial Supreme Court decision in 2010 that reversed century-old campaign finance restrictions and enabled ...

That was new, and in the 2008 presidential election, nondisclosed spending hit a record $78.8 million. The other case was 2010's Citizens United v. FEC, which made it possible for corporations, unions ...

In January 2010, the Supreme Court significantly weakened existing campaign finance laws. The Court's ruling in Citizen's United v. FEC — the latest and most sweeping of a long string of court ...