The federal judge who will decide how to limit Google’s monopoly in search is considering its advantage in artificial ...

The Justice Department and Google have one final chance to convince a federal judge how the tech giant should change its ...

South Korea’s Fair Trade Commission said on May 22 that it has decided to initiate consent decree proceedings in a case ...

One of the key questions in this trial will be what a fair search market actually looks like. Google’s case has always been that it became a dominant player in search simply by being the best ...

“Google made its trillions by monopolizing the online advertising market, then Google uses its ... significant remedies that provide a path to fair competition and an open internet for all.” ...

So what does it even mean that they were monopolizing the ad market? Rohit Chopra ... spend money to advertise online. And Google took more than its fair share on both sides of that equation.

“Google won its place in the market fair and square,” he said. The final decision will be up to Mehta, who found last August that Google has an illegal monopoly in internet search. Mehta will ...

“Google won its place in the market fair and square,” Schmidtlein said, adding that the government’s proposals “will reward competitors with advantages they never would have earned in a ...

“Google won its place in the market fair and square,” he said. “Divesting Google of its hard-earned innovations so that lesser rivals can use them will not promote competition.” Chrome and ...

“Google won its place in the market fair and square,” Schmidtlein said. The moment of reckoning comes four-and-a-half-years after the Justice Department filed a landmark lawsuit alleging ...

Japan’s Fair Trade Commission ordered Alphabet Inc.’s Google to stop alleged abuse of its market power over local smartphone manufacturers, just ahead of high-stakes trade negotiations with ...