The Duke of Sussex has been “singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment”, the Court of Appeal has heard in the royal’s challenge over his level of security in the UK.

The Constitutional Court's refusal to hear AfriForum's appeal on the "Kill the Boer" ruling raises serious concerns about ...

In a pivotal moment for public safety and community governance, business leaders in Rio de Janeiro welcomed the Supreme Court's decision to relax certain aspects of the Direct Action of ...

Opinion: Sullivan & Cromwell attorneys Alex Willscher and Sam Bonafede say the criminal defense bar should be wary of a small ...

An appeal over refused plans to build new homes next to a historic Derby building, which used to be a library, has been ...

The Constitutional Court might also have considered the impeccably reasoned 2011 judgement of Judge Colin Lamont in which he found that the singing of “the Kill the Boer” song was, indeed, hate speech ...

New York's midlevel appeals courts generally issue rulings via four or five-judge panels. But there are some matters that are left to individual appellate justices.

A “lack of mitigation” was a key reason for Nottingham Forest’s appeal against a £750,000 fine for misconduct being dismissed. The Reds had been brought to book by the Football Association ...

Colorado's second-highest court ruled last week that corporations in general — and Xcel Energy specifically — may be held ...

At first glance, it might seem far-fetched to suggest a whistleblower law that’s been on the books for decades, invoked in ...

The use of saliva to shine the cricket ball is a deeply ingrained tradition, crucial for maintaining the ball's condition, especially in the longer formats of the game. However, this practice was ...

The Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled that a former client’s receipt of a monetary benefit as a direct result of an arbitral award justified the payment of a contingency fee to the lawyer who assisted ...