While changes are being proposed, it may be helpful to view these impediments as a company would, thinking of them as “the cost of doing business” in California.

A Superior Court ruling says the FAIR insurance plan violates state law, raising concerns for homeowners relying on it for wildfire-related coverage.

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled that the California FAIR Plan’s smoke-damage policy directly violates state law by denying coverage for clean-up and remediatons, a very expensive ...

Judge rules California’s FAIR Plan must pay smoke damage claims "The dirty secret" is that (denying claims) saves the carriers millions of dollars, according to the plaintiff's lawyer.

The FAIR Plan in a statement to the Southern California News Group on Wednesday, June 25 said the statewide carrier’s “burn damage and smoke damage claims” are now being handled consistent with ...

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has ruled that the California FAIR Plan's smoke-damage policy, which limits claims payments by the insurer of last resort, is a violation of state ...

A Los Angeles County judge on Tuesday said the California FAIR Plan — considered the state’s home insurance of last resort — unlawfully limited coverage for smoke damage claims in its policy ...

A Los Angeles County judge on Tuesday said the California FAIR Plan — considered the state’s home insurance of last resort — unlawfully limited coverage for smoke damage claims in its policy ...

The ruling: Judge Stuart Rice said the California FAIR Plan violates the state’s insurance code because it offers less coverage than is required by state policy.

California's FAIR Plan is often a last resort for people who can't get insurance for their homes. Some fire victims say the state-run plan is anything but fair.