I doubt there are many readers of this magazine who are pro-choice. Why, then, do I write an argument against abortion for its readers? Why preach to the choir? Preaching to the choir is a ...

More than a half-century after the U.S. Supreme Court, in Roe v. Wade, promulgated a "constitutional right to abortion," and ...

With federal power no longer in play, even arguments over abortion can become less acrimonious as Americans reach consensus ...

Pro-choice advocates say the science is settled on the abortion pill mifepristone, but critics argue that better safeguards ...

Abortion bans in the United States are exacerbating existing health disparities as births increase in high-risk populations ...

In a court filing they said the doctors and their patients will suffer irreparable harm if the Indiana Department of Health discloses abortion ... to the defendant’s arguments in order to ...

Claims about religious conscience are nothing new in debates about reproduction in the United States. Employers cited it in ...

The political arm of Pro-Life Wisconsin has not endorsed in the state Supreme Court race, but its staffers are advocating for Brad Schimel.

(We must also note that voters in Missouri and Kansas supported the pro-choice position in statewide abortion amendments ... If the Supreme Court goes for this argument, it could also affect ...

In the race for Wisconsin Supreme Court, Brad Schimel and Susan Crawford bring contrasting statements and history on abortion.

LOWCOUNTRY, S.C. (WCIV) — South Carolina’s fetal heartbeat law is back under fire, as the State Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in a case against the state’s abortion ban Wednesday.